Q Why did the President pick a man who is so contemptible of the public servants in Washington to be his Domestic Advisor — saying, “People in Washington are morally repugnant, cheating, shifty human beings”? Why would he pick such a man to be a Domestic Advisor?
MR. SNOW: You meant contemptuous, as opposed to contemptible, I think.
Q Pure contempt.
MR. SNOW: Well, I’m not sure it’s pure contempt. I know Karl Zinsmeister pretty well, and he is somebody who expresses himself with a certain amount of piquancy — you’re perhaps familiar with that, aren’t you, Helen? And so, as a consequence, from time to time he’s going to say — he’ll have some sharp elbows.
Q If this is his attitude toward public servants –
MR. SNOW: No, I don’t think it’s his attitude toward public servants — it may have been toward the press. Just kidding. No, I — look, if you look at the bulk of what Karl Zinsmeister has done at The American Enterprise and elsewhere, I think you’re going to find somebody who’s done some pretty meaty and interesting research on a variety of topics.
The reason he’s being brought in is that he’s –
Q Do you agree with his assessment of Washington?
MR. SNOW: I’m not — there’s one sentence the guy wrote, and perhaps you may recall — yes?
Q Arrogant, morally repugnant, cheating, shifty — come on.
MR. SNOW: That’s a lot in one sentence, isn’t it? He just packed it right in.
Jim.
Q So what is the attitude toward –
MR. SNOW: The attitude is we’re glad to have a guy on board who has breadth of knowledge, who has breadth of interest and of experience, and is going to bring –
Q No tolerance for other human beings.
MR. SNOW: Helen, tell you what, why don’t you get to know Karl, because I think you’re going to find out that to judge somebody –
Q Bring him on. (Laughter.)
MR. SNOW: — on the basis of one sentence is probably a little unfair.
Q How could it be unfair?
MR. SNOW: He’ll charm you.
Q I don’t want to get in the way of this. (Laughter.) Let me ask you about this morning’s statement…
Full Transcript